Difference between revisions of "Talk:Skills"
(→Verbing) |
(→Intellect Skills: new section) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Is this idea worth the trouble? ―[[User:Doublecompile|Double Compile]] 11:36, 12 June 2011 (EDT) | Is this idea worth the trouble? ―[[User:Doublecompile|Double Compile]] 11:36, 12 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
:I think this is worth it. Consistency never hurts. -[[User:Kozak|Kozak]] 17:48, 16 June 2011 (EDT) | :I think this is worth it. Consistency never hurts. -[[User:Kozak|Kozak]] 17:48, 16 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Intellect Skills == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now I have in my head an idea that rearranges the skill checks for Intellect where we have something like Solve, Create, and Operate or something. Just a thought that I wanted to write down. | ||
Latest revision as of 19:31, 3 April 2022
Verbing
I noticed some of our skills are present-tense verbs (Run, Swim, Dodge, Search, etc.) and some of them are not. I kind of like the idea of skills all being verbs. It's a lot more natural for reading. Example: "You take a penalty to Perform" sounds like an actual sentence, as opposed to "You take a penalty to Performance". The problem is that I'm having trouble coming up with verbs for some of our skills. Here are some examples of ones that are easily translated:
- Perception → Perceive
- Healing → Heal
- Reaction → React
Some of the more difficult ones include Mettle, Clairvoyance, and Machinery, but there are others.
Is this idea worth the trouble? ―Double Compile 11:36, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- I think this is worth it. Consistency never hurts. -Kozak 17:48, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
Intellect Skills
Now I have in my head an idea that rearranges the skill checks for Intellect where we have something like Solve, Create, and Operate or something. Just a thought that I wanted to write down.
